BEWARE:
I am writing to detail my experience with Podlaski Attorneys at Law, covering the period from September 6, 2024 through August 8, 2025. What should have been straightforward legal representation instead turned into a deeply disappointing, unprofessional, and costly ordeal. I feel it is my responsibility to warn others before they consider engaging this firm.
Despite paying $15,000 in legal fees, contacting the Bar Association, and repeatedly requesting updates, we received almost no meaningful communication or legal progress. Our only direct interaction with the firm consisted of a single phone call—for which we were billed—and no in-person meeting whatsoever with Kevin Podlaski, the attorney we hired and trusted with our case.
Warning: stay far away from Podlaski Attorneys at Law.
Unprofessional behavior. No updates. Misrepresentation. Invoice recycling. No results.
Complete Failure in Handling Our Case
We retained this firm for a roofing warranty dispute. Prior to hiring him, Kevin Podlaski assured us we had a very strong case, specifically because the roofing materials were under warranty. After paying the retainer, he inexplicably reversed his stance—claiming the opposite—even though third-party experts confirmed that we indeed had a valid warranty claim.
From September 2024 to December 2024, our case was handed off to an associate, Brayton Conley, who later left the firm in early 2025 without any notice or communication to us. His lack of legal knowledge and procedural understanding forced us—the clients—to give him guidance, provide legal strategy, and even advise him on negotiation tactics. Meanwhile, the firm continued charging us for every call, email, and document shuffle.
It became obvious that invoices were being recycled and tasks were being billed without actual progress.
There were no confirmed results, no presented strategy, and no measurable movement on the case.
Improper Handoffs, Misrepresentation, and More Billing
After Conley’s departure, the case was transferred to Jennifer E. McKibben, who promptly informed us that we “never had a strong case to begin with”—contradicting both their initial position and external expert evaluations. We never agreed to have McKibben represent us. The handoff was done without our consent and in a manner that was both improper and unprofessional.
We attempted to reconnect with Kevin Podlaski, but he refused to meet in person or take responsibility for the confusion, mismanagement, and lack of progress. Instead, the firm focused on pressuring us for additional legal fees—$3,500 more—just to address the third-party materials company, which was the central path to resolving the warranty issue.
When we refused to continue throwing money into a black hole, we submitted separation paperwork. In return, the firm attempted to threaten litigation against us for refusing to pay for results that were never delivered. After direct negotiation, we were able to reduce their claim by approximately 60%, and Kevin Podlaski accepted the separation terms.
Attempts to Silence Us
Following the separation, Podlaski attempted to coerce us into signing a non-disclosure agreement to prevent us from writing an honest review about their conduct. When we declined, his paralegals began sending repeated, aggressive follow-ups with the NDA attached.
Suggestion: block their emails. Their behavior after termination was as unprofessional as their representation.
Final Assessment
Podlaski Attorneys at Law exhibited:
Misrepresentation of the case’s strength
Lack of communication
Failure to provide updates or results
Improper attorney handoffs
Excessive and unjustified billing
Pressure tactics to extract additional fees
Attempts to silence negative feedback via NDA
If you are considering legal representation, I strongly advise you to avoid this firm entirely. The experience was costly—in time, money, and trust—and delivered absolutely no benefit.