๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ญ๐: ๐๐ข๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง ๐
๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง, ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ฑ๐๐ฌ
๐๐ฎ๐๐ก๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐๐ซ ๐ฏ๐ฌ. ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฅ & ๐๐ซ๐ฌ.
Facts of the Case
โช๏ธ Issue: The GST registration of the assessee was cancelled due to non-filing of returns.
Court Judgment
โช๏ธ Decision:
โช๏ธ Setting Aside Cancellation: The court set aside the order cancelling the GST registration of the assessee.
โช๏ธ Reasoning: The court noted that suspension or revocation of the license would be counterproductive, as it would hinder the assessee's ability to conduct business and ultimately affect tax recovery.
โช๏ธ Pragmatic View: The court urged the Department to take a pragmatic view, considering that the registration was cancelled due to non-filing of returns.
Compliance Requirements:
โช๏ธThe assessee was directed to file returns for the entire period of default.
โช๏ธThe assessee must pay the requisite amount of tax, interest, fine, and penalty.
โช๏ธ Restoration of Registration: The Jurisdictional Officer was directed to restore the assessee's GST registration upon compliance with these requirements.
Conclusion: The Calcutta High Court's decision emphasizes a pragmatic approach towards GST registration cancellations, facilitating business continuity while ensuring compliance and tax recovery.