๐ข ๐๐จ๐จ๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐จ๐ ๐ฅ๐:
๐ข๐๐: ๐๐ง ๐ง๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐
๐๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ง๐ฌ-๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ, ๐๐ข๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ โ๐ง๐จ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ซโ
๐๐จ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ซ ๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ซ ๐ฏ๐ฌ. ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฉ๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ซ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐๐
Facts:
โช๏ธThe Delhi High Court addressed a batch of writ petitions challenging assessment orders issued just before the expiry of the limitation period for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19.
โช๏ธThe court directed that no adverse orders be passed against the petitioners without providing them a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
Key Points:
โช๏ธThe High Court set aside the assessment orders made under Section 73 of the CGST Act, citing a lack of reasoning and the fact that they were rushed through in the last days before the limitation period expired.
โช๏ธPetitioners argued that the extension of time for completing adjudication would defeat the purpose of a specified adjudicatory timeframe.
โช๏ธConcerns were also raised about the use of Artificial Intelligence for issuing a large number of show cause notices without human review.
โช๏ธThe Court remanded the matters for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority.